Copyright Law Basics

Copyright Basics

There are numerous inexact aspects of U.S. copyright law, but the lack of precision exists to provide broad protection to creators of a vast range of original work. For example, computer programs and certain “compilations” can be registered as “literary works.” Maps and technical drawings can be registered as “pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works.” “Registered” is rather simple. See, Registration of a copyrighted work is rather simple. See website. But, registration is unnecessary for there to be a copyright.

More specifically, but still inexact, copyright protects human authors’ independently created, at least minimally creative original works of authorship fixed in a tangible form of expression. “Fixed” means a sufficiently permanent medium to allow perception of the work in its original form, reproduced, or communicated or transmitted for longer than a short time. Copyright protection exists immediately and automatically upon creation of a work and the authorship is fixed. Marks like © or the word “Copyright” can be helpful but are not required for copyright protection.

Legal issues concerning copyright protection in the 21st Century frequently arises regarding original work and copying of software. But in addition to software and related technology matter, copyright law with its origins in Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution, concerns all original creative works of authorship, such as paintings, drawings, writing, architecture, films, photography, and music. Copyright protection is secured automatically when the author’s work is fixed in a tangible medium of expression for the first time.

The 1976 Copyright Act (and its predecessor, the Copyright Act of 1909) provide copyright owners the exclusive right to pursue many avenues with their works, e.g., make and distribute copies, prepare “derivative” works based upon the original work, and importantly, the right to transfer their ownership (often as a license), and the right to perform or display their work publicly. Copyright owners’ exclusivity generally lasts for the author or creator’s life plus 70 years. the work becomes part of the public domain. Public domain works may be used without permission.

The public policy that underlies the Copyright Act is broad and enduring copyright protection, to motivate creativity by the providing a limited monopoly to allow public access to the fruits or an author or inventor’s creativity, but also to give the public access after the limited period of exclusive control has expired.

In the 21st Century context, it is important to understand the notion that the law requires no notice of copyright protection. Especially since marks like © or the word “Copyright” are helpful, caution is required. When, for example, materials are online, it can be difficult to know if creative material like blog posts, photographs, or videos are copyright protected. Interestingly, digital materials that are stored on a server are likely fixed or tangible, and are therefore presumably copyright protected. Accordingly, one should assume what is found online is protected and seek the poster’s or author’s permission to us it, unless permission is legally unnecessary. Our discussion of the fair use doctrines is here.

The copyright and trademark lawyers at Lubin Austermuehle have over thirty-years of experience defending and prosecuting intellectual property claims for large and mid-size corporations and businesses. We are knowledgeable regarding the changes and complexities of copyright and trademark law. We are committed to fighting for our clients' property rights or defending them against baseless infringement claims at both the trial and appellate court levels. We have successfully defended large corporations in multi-million-dollar copyright or trademark infringement suits and regularly prosecute complex copyright infringement cases for computer software having achieved large six and seven figure settlements for our clients. Conveniently located in Chicago and Elmhurst, Illinois, we have successfully litigated intellectual property, trademark and copyright cases for clients all over the Chicago area. To schedule a consultation with one of our skilled attorneys, you can contact us online or give us a call at 630-333-0333.

Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog - Trademark and Copyright Litigation
Client Reviews
I was referred to Peter Lubin from someone in the car business to handle a law suit. From the moment I made the appointment Peter and his staff were outstanding. This wasn't an easy case, most lawyers had turned me down. However, Peter took the time to meet with me and review everything. He took on the case, and constantly communicated with me about updates and case information. We beat this non-compete agreement case in record time. I would use him again and recommend him to my closest family and friends. 5 stars is not enough to thank him for his service. Sebastian R.
I worked on two occasions with Peter Lubin and his staff. They took their time with me and discussed each and every item in detail. The group makes you feel like you are part of the family and not just another hourly charge. I recommend Peter to anyone who asks me for a referral. If you are looking for a top notch attorney at a reasonable rate, look no further than Lubin Austermuehle. Kurt A.
Excellent law firm. My case was a complicated arbitration dispute from another state. Was handled with utmost professionalism and decency. Mr. Peter Lubin was able to successfully resolve the case on my behalf and got me a very favorable settlement. Would recommend to anyone looking for a serious law firm. Great staff and great lawyers! Albey L.
I have known Peter Lubin for over 30 years. He has represented me on occasion with sound legal advice. He is a shrewd and tough negotiator leading to positive outcomes and averting prolonged legal hassles in court. He comes from a family with a legal pedigree and deep roots in Chicago's top legal community. You want him on your case. You need him on your opponents case. He won't stop fighting until he wins. Christopher G.
Peter was really nice and helpful when I came to him with an initial question about a non-compete. Would definitely reach out again, recommended to everyone. Johannes B.