Business Litigation

Business Dispute and Commercial Litigation Record

Lubin Austermuehle has over 35 years of experience representing our clients in many different complex business and commercial disputes and employment matters. We have successfully represented owners, partners, shareholders or LLC members in closely held business disputes such as corporate freeze-outs, squeeze-outs, dissolutions or control disputes as well as disputes arising from breaches of fiduciary duty or claimed minority owner or shareholder oppression. We have prosecuted or defended scores of claims of this type. We also handle many different types of employment matters including wrongfully terminations of commissioned salespeople in bad faith to deny them substantial commissions, non-compete agreements, trade secret theft claims, and wrongful termination of employment for race, sex or national origin discrimination. We have prosecuted or defended many franchise or dealer termination claims. We also have extensive experience prosecuting and defending fraud claims and intellectual property disputes involving claimed misappropriation of trademarks, trade secrets or copyrights. We have handled a significant number of copyright disputes involving rights to computer software programs, a number of which have resulted in substantial settlements or judgment in our client's favor following extensive discovery. Our lawyers also defend and prosecute defamation, libel and slander claims and have wide-ranging experience litigating the First Amendment and other fact-intensive defenses that arise in this evolving area of the law where people now regularly engage in robust commentary on the internet that can give rise to defamation claims. We have won judgments or settlements in multi-million dollar commercial cases along with the smaller dollar disputes. Our lawyers handle both the trial and appellate court work in our cases, have achieved significant wins at trial or at appellate levels for our individual, small business and corporate clients.

Dealer Termination / Franchise / Securities

John Doe v John Doe Auto Repair Franchise, AAA Arbitration. 2017. Former Franchisee sued for alleged violation of non-compete with fee-shifting provision in franchise agreement awarding fees to prevailing party. Former Franchisee had merely leased former franchise premises to a new tenant that competed. Franchisor settled on the eve of the arbitration hearing by dropping claims and paying a part of our client's fees.

Flynn Beverage Inc. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc., United States District Court Central District of Illinois, Rock Island Division, Judge McDade. 1992-1994. Wrongful termination of 27-year liquor distributorship involving statutory and common law franchise claims. Represented Flynn Beverage. Sought over $2 million in damages and recovery of attorney fees. Seagram's fifty-page motion to dismiss denied. See 815 FSupp 1174. The case settled: terms confidential. Opposing counsel: David W. Ichel (Simpson Thacher & Bartlett) and T. Mark McLaughlin (Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw).

Flynn Beverage Inc. v. Jim Beam Brands Inc., Circuit Court of Rock Island County, Judge Conway. 1993-1995. Similar claims to those discussed above except claimed over $2.5 million in claimed damages. Jim Beam's motion to dismiss denied in a 5-page memorandum opinion. The case settled: terms confidential. Opposing counsel: Kimball R. Anderson and Scott Szala (Winston & Strawn).

Dedicated v. Volkswagen, United States District Court Northern District of Illinois, Judge Kennelly. 2001. Termination of Volkswagen parts carrier. Represented Dedicated. Volkswagen's motion to dismiss, asserting lack of written evidence of a contract, denied. See 201 FRD 337. The case settled: terms confidential. Opposing Counsel: Randall Oyler (Barrack Ferrazzano).

McVicker v. John Doe Corp., Texas Arbitration through the American Arbitration Association. 1990-1992. Wrongful termination of and fraudulent inducement to purchase franchises for entire New York City area. Represented former franchisee. At outset of case defendant, a multi-billion dollar international conglomerate, offered $10,000 to settle. After extensive discovery and shortly before the start of the hearing, defendants agreed to a settlement whereby they returned the entire purchase price of the franchises of $300,000 along with an additional $50,000. Opposing counsel: David Butler (DLA Piper).

Trademark / Copyright / Trade Secrets

Berg v. CI Investment Co., United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Judge Kocoras. 2016. Represented Defendant the largest mutual fund company in Canada. Claims that Defendant engaged in trade secret and copyright infringement of complex trading software seeking over $2,000,000 in damages. After expedited discovery, a partial summary judgment entered in our client's favor as to all infringement claims based on implied license and case dismissed. Opposing Counsel: Michael Childress (Childress, Loucks & Plunkett)

Berthold v. FKPT, United States District Court Northern District of Illinois, Judge Andersen. 1999. We represented the plaintiff who terminated its German licensee of trademarked typeface fonts for use in computer software. The fonts were part of a large German font library that was over 140 years old. Claims and counter-claims included claims under German and American law and international discovery issues. Settlement permitted plaintiff to terminate German licensee and licensee waived all claims to rights in fonts. Opposing Counsel: Caroline Clark (Pennie & Edmonds); Chuck McGirdy (DLA Piper).

Virtual Realty Group v. Virtual Realty Network, United States District Court Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Judge Nordberg, 1995. Represented owner of "Virtual Realty" mark in a trademark infringement action. Defendant and its partner Intel had invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in advertising and promoting the "Virtual Realty" mark that did not belong to them. They claimed there was no possibility of consumer confusion between their computerized home loan mortgage brokerage services, and plaintiff's Internet-based real-estate brokerage services. The case settled before injunction hearing. Defendant agreed to immediately discontinue using the mark and to pay money damages and plaintiff's attorneys fees. Opposing Counsel: Russell Pelton (Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly).

DevTech v. Rolfes, Circuit Court of DuPage County, Judge Wheaton. 1992. Claim that computer software designer/former employee stole trade secrets and acted in a manner that damaged the plaintiff and defendant's joint copyright in certain software. Represented defendant (software designer/former employee). Plaintiff dismissed all claims on the verge of a preliminary injunction trial when the judge indicated that she intended to rule in defendant's favor on a motion to exclude key witnesses for the plaintiff. Plaintiff agreed to divide equally with the defendant all profits from jointly owned software. Opposing counsel: Edward Ruberry (Bolinger Ruberry & Garvey).

Berthold v. Linotype, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. 2002. Represented plaintiff. Our client claimed that another font software company violated copyright laws in illegally copying software code for its own font software. Case settled. Opposing Counsel: Jim McGurk, Paul Stack and Robert Filpi (Stack & Filpi).

Berthhold v. FKPT, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Judges Lindberg and Gettleman. 2001. Represented Plaintiff. Obtained default judge and injunctive relief against German Company for trademark infringement and breach of settlement agreement and then enforced such judgment against third-party German corporations and nationals living and doing business here. Case settled with third parties agreeing to injunctive relief protecting plaintiff's trademarks and discontinuing the sale of infringing products here and in Germany. Opposing Counsel: Robert Filpi and Paul Stack (Stack & Filpi) and Robert Joseph (Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal).

Berthold v Volvo, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Judge Durkin. 2017-2018. Represented Berthold in claims for allegd misappropriation of copyrighted scalable computer font software and alleged violation of a consent decree. Case settled on confidential terms. Opposing counsel: Steven Jedlinski (Holland & Knight LLP); Robert N. Phillips (Reid Smith).

Breach of Contract / Partnership / Corporate Control

Farmers Insurance v Modory, Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Judge Allen. 2016-2018. Farmers filed a declaratory judgment lawsuit against our client claiming it did not have to honor its obligation in his homeowners' insurance policy to pay for his successful defense of a federal libel suit, even though his policy provided for libel insurance. We had already obtained dismissal of the meritless libel suit. We counter sued Farmers. The trial judge ruled in Farmers' favor and did not correctly interpret the policy or follow controlling Illinois law requiring construing the conflicting policy terms that Farmers had inserted into its policy in favor of the insured. We appealed and prevailed in the Appellate Court. The Appellate Court found that Farmers was required to pay for our client's successful defense of the libel suit. See 2019 IL App (1st) 180721-U. Co-counsel: Mark Monroe. Opposing counsel: Danny Worker and Jonathan Goken (Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP).

Lakhani v. American Powder Coatings, Inc., Circuit Court of Cook County, 2017-2018. Judge James Murphy. Represented minority owner in a closely held corporation. Our client claimed that the majority shareholders had engaged in oppression by refusing to make distributions of substantial profits and were allegedly receiving excessive compensation. We also claimed that the majority was undervaluing the corporation for purposes of buying out our client’s interest. The case was resolved on confidential terms. Opposing Counsel: John McGuirk (Hoscheit, McGuirk, McCracken & Cuscaden, P.C.); Michael Trucco (Stamos & Trucco LLP).

Minimally Invasive Therapy Specialists, P.C. v. Health and Home Management, Inc., American Arbitration Association and Circuit Court of Cook County, 2017-2018. Represented the plaintiff, a medical services provider what sold diagnostic services to a chain of nursing homes. We sought to collect hundreds of thousands in unpaid invoices. We obtained a judgment in the arbitration for the amount outstanding plus interest and all attorneys’ fees and costs. We then registered the judgment in the Circuit Court and began collection proceedings. We recovered the entire judgment plus additional collection costs and attorneys’ fees. Opposing Counsel: Brian Stines (Vanek, Larson & Kolb, LLC).

Aranas v. Suburban Neurologists S.C., Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Judges Allen and Mullen. 2014-2018. Represented Plaintiff Neurologist in a breach of shareholder purchase agreement and non-compete agreement dispute. We obtained summary judgment in favor of our client in the breach of shareholder purchase agreement claims and defeated the Defendant's claim that our client violated the non-compete agreement. We had previously prevailed in injunction proceedings where Defendant had tried to close down our client's new medical practice and then prevailed in the Appellate Court. We then went to trial and obtained a substantial monetary damages verdict for our client at a bench trial regarding the Defendant's breach of the shareholder purchase agreement. Opposing counsel: Norman Lerum.

Dr. FM, LLC v. Hoscon Ltd. et al, American Arbitration Association and Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division and Law Division. Judges Mikva and White. 2013-2016. Our client the Plaintiff, an emergency room physician formed a partnership with two other physicians to open an urgent care center. Our client's partners wrongfully removed him from the partnership, denying him the fruits of quarter-million-dollar investment to start the business. Our client's investment included $80,000 in cash but also $180,000 in estimated "sweat equity" for providing start-up services. We sought to unwind the transaction and return of his entire investment. We prevailed at an arbitration hearing and obtained a judgment for 100% of our client's claimed damages. The Defendants then tried to contend that the arbitrator's award was improper in state proceedings after retaining new lawyers. We prevailed on those claims as well. We then initiated a judgment enforcement action and collected all of our client's damages plus 9% post-judgment interest. Opposing Counsel: Anish Parikh; John M. O'Driscoll (Tressler LLP).

Eastco International Corporation v. Addax Technologies, LLC, Federal Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Magistrate Judge Cole. 2013. Represented Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff in breach of contract action alleging that florescent ballast production units differed from sample units. Plaintiff purported to unilaterally cancel all outstanding contracts with defendant giving rise to a countersuit for breach of those contracts. Case settled with Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant dropping all claims and agreeing to pay Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff a confidential amount. Opposing Counsel: Peter Carey (Carey & Hartman LLC).

Biancos v. Eggert, Freeland and CMR Interiors, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Magistrate-Judge Valdez. Represented a real estate owner in his breach of contract case against lessees who performed renovations to the leased premises. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants failed to obtain proper building permits and that the renovation does not comply with Chicago building codes. The settlement provided that certain defendants agreed to increase rental payments and paying a large share of clients' fees and costs, and other defendants agreeing to pay money damages. Opposing Counsel: Terrance Buehler (Buehler & Williams), Peter Berk (McDonald Hopkins, LLC) and Robert Rosenfeld.

Costello v. Orozen, Circuit Court of DuPage County, Judge Abraham. 2007. Represented construction company defendant in a breach of contract case involving the installation of a practice putting green on the grounds of the plaintiff's mansion. The case settled for a small fraction of money sought after we obtained evidence rebutting plaintiff's claims from one of his own experts. Opposing Counsel: Greg Adamo and Ken Vanko (Clingen, Callow & McLean, LLC).

BleuChip International Inc. v. Aulds, Circuit Court of DuPage County, Chancery Division, Judge Popejoy. 2009. Represented corporation and its CEO as plaintiffs in a claim against the corporation's President. The case settled on confidential terms shortly after the suit was filed. Opposing Counsel: Bruce Menkes (Mandel, Menkes LLC)

Anderson et al v. Moy-Gregg, Circuit Court of DuPage County, Chancery Division, Judge Popejoy and Judge Sheen. 2010-2011. Represent corporation and alleged majority owners in a corporate control dispute regarding the intent and meaning of the stock gift. Opposing Counsel: Louis Bernstein.

IPC v. Edward Gray Corporation, Circuit Court of Peoria County, Judge McDade. 1988-1989. Construction Contract: local Peoria sub-contractor claimed that Chicago based general contractor entered into a $3 million sub-contract from a car telephone. Represented general contractor defendant. Court entered summary judgment in defendant's favor on all of plaintiff's claims based on "smoking gun" documents uncovered by the defendant in discovery. Opposing counsel: Stephen Gay (Husch & Eppenberger).

DiMucci v. DiMucci, Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Judges Forman, Flynn and Billik. Pending. Corporate control dispute involving real-estate development assets. Represented 50% owner allegedly frozen out of companies. Involves questions of alleged breach of fiduciary duty and issues involving Florida and Illinois corporation law. Opposing Counsel: George Collins and Adrian Vuckovich (Collins, Bargione & Vuckovich), Myron Cherry (Myron Cherry & Associates).

Click to Read Chicago Sun-Times Coverage of this Case

Leslie Hindman and Salvage I v. Beale, Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Judge Siebel. 2003. Represented plaintiffs Hindman and Salvage I in alleged breach of fiduciary duty case involving multi-million dollar damages claims. Case Settled. Terms Confidential. Co-Counsel: Michael Froy (Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal). Opposing Counsel: Larry Karlin and Ben Randall (Katz, Radall, Weinberg & Richmond).

Estate of Hudson, Circuit Court of DuPage County, Probate Division. Judge Popejoy. Pending. Complex estate case. Representing guardian of the minor child. The dispute involved claims regarding personal and business assets made against the estate administrator and surviving spouse. The case involved local and overseas proceedings with claims seeking to recover millions of dollars in funds and business assets allegedly owned by the Estate. The settlement required the administrator and stepmother to recognize our client's joint interest in transportation business then worth seven figures and to pay a large share of our client's attorney fees and costs. Opposing Counsel: Douglas Tibble (Brooks Adams & Tarilis) and Richard Cowen (Stahl Cowen).

Heatherly and Newton v. Rodman & Renshaw, NASD Arbitration. 1993-1996. Represented former Sales Managers of Rodman's Mortgage Backed Securities Department on claims for breach of substantial bonus contracts, and failure to pay finders fees. Two-day hearing. Arbitration award for claimants; claimants awarded all actual damages sought. Heatherly's appeal on statutory attorneys fees denied with dissent supporting our position. 678 NE2d 591. Opposing Counsel: John Murphy (Baker & McKenzie).

Cusack v. Paul Revere Insurance, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Magistrate Judge Guzman. 1995. Represented plaintiff. Paul Revere refused to pay employment disability benefits of over $200,000. Brought declaratory judgment and bad faith failure to pay insurance claims. The case settled immediately after the complaint was filed: terms confidential. Opposing Counsel: Joseph Hasman (Peterson & Ross).

Meade v., Circuit Court of Cook County Chancery Division, Judge Nowicki. 1999-2000. Represented co-founder of start-up internet company who was allegedly defrauded out of his interest in the company just before it was sold to a publicly traded company. Seeking 1,000,000 shares in publicly traded company worth between 2 and 7.5 million dollars based on then market prices. Settled after an injunction hearing and denials of defendants' motions to dismiss. Terms confidential. Opposing Counsel: Ceasar Tabet (Tabet, DeVito & Rothstein) and Stephen Voris (Burke Warren Mackay & Serritella).

Asch and Associates v. Churilla, Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Judge Foreman. 1993-1994. Former employee charged with stealing a customer list to start a rival insurance agency. Represented former employee defendant. Court denied plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order. The court later granted summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims with prejudice, and awarded defendant sanctions (half the attorney's fees billed to the defendant and all of his costs). Defendant later filed claims for malicious prosecution against Asch and his counsel in federal court. That case was settled for $45,000. Opposing counsel: James D. Montgomery (former Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago).


Glaser and Sapyta v. Collins, Hamilton and the College of DuPage, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Judge Alonso. 2015-2017. Claims for wrongful termination, violation first amendment rights and 1983 as to former Treasurer and Controller of the College of DuPage. The case settled: financial terms confidential. Also after contested hearings defeated College's attempt to deny Saypta unemployment and prevailed on the appeal of that ruling. Co-Counsel: Shelly Kulwin (Kulwin Masciopinto & Kulwin, LLP) Opposing Counsel: Sidley & Austin; Schiff Hardin & Waite; and Schuyler, Roche & Crisham.

Click to Read Press Coverage of this Case

Motorola v. Aderhold, Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Judge Arnold. 2009-2010. Represented defendant former Motorola vice-president in a covenant not to compete and trade secret case. The case settled on confidential terms, before any discovery, after the court granted a motion to dismiss and ordered re-pleading of trade secret claims. Opposing Counsel Arthur Howe (Schopf & Weiss).

Karth v. McConnell, Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Judge Goldberg. 2006-2007. Represented defendant in breach of contract, equitable and wage claim dispute involving alleged damages of $700,000. Breach of contract claim dismissed as violating the statute of frauds. Case dismissed with prejudice based on motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. Opposing Counsel: Michael D. Gerhardt (Gerhardt, Gomez, and Haskins).

Shelton v. Will County, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Judge Shadur. 1999. Race Discrimination. Client reinstated to his job with full credit towards his pension benefits and received a settlement of $50,000 in back pay for the period he was off the job. Opposing Counsel: Michael Condon (Hervas, Sotos, Condon & Bersani).

Click to Read Chicago Tribune Coverage of this Case

Hirst v. Rockwell International, EEOC Charge. 1995-1996. We represented senior executive in breach of contract and sex and age discrimination claims. Rockwell demoted executive based on trumped up conflict of interest charges because her husband worked for a competitor, even though executive/wife had fully disclosed the nature of her husband's relationship each year during the over 10 years that she worked for Rockwell, and Rockwell had always agreed that there was no conflict. Case settled: terms confidential. Co-Counsel: Holly Hirst (Piper Rudnick).

North American Philips v. Filson et al., United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Judge Grady. 1996. Represented defendants, former No. 2 and 3 executives at Philips's most profitable American subsidiary in a case charging those executives, and the former president of the subsidiary with what we contended were trumped up charges of wrongdoing. Executives filed counterclaims for libel claiming that Philips had falsely accused them of wrongdoing, and retaliatory discharge for reporting alleged antitrust violations and price-fixing. The case settled immediately after counter-claims filed: terms confidential. Co-lead Counsel: Matthew Kennelly (Cotsirilos Stephenson Tighe & Streiker). Opposing Counsel: Robin Cohen (Anderson Kill Olick & Oshinsky).

Duncan v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., Circuit Court of Lake County, Judge Hoogasian. 1990. Wrongful termination: plaintiff claimed that she was fired because she filed a workers' compensation claim and sought over $100,000 in lost wage damages and punitive damages and attorney fees. Represented defendant Baxter. After discovery, plaintiff agreed to dismiss all her claims with prejudice in return for Baxter agreeing not to file a sanctions motion seeking recovery of attorneys fees from plaintiff and her counsel due to plaintiff's fraudulent damages claims. Opposing counsel: Alan Blum.

Appleby v. Mrs. Illinois Pageant, Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division. Judge Hett. 1999. Represented Mrs. Illinois Pageant in a suit filed by runner-up to reverse pageant results, and crown her the winner. Plaintiff's lawsuit thrown out on summary judgment. Plaintiff paid a large portion of the defendant's attorneys fees to settle sanctions claim.

Click to Read Chicago Sun-Times Coverage of this Case

Obos v. Cubs, Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division. 2003. Represented plaintiff in battery and reckless retention of security guard claims. Case settled. Terms confidential. Motion to add punitive damages detailed the 9-year history of abuse by Chicago Cubs security guard who attacked numerous other patrons and used excessive force resulting in repeated lawsuits. This case was featured in an investigative report on Fox News regarding the Cubs' failure to fire this rogue security guard. Opposing counsel: Scott Bentivenga (Bollinger Ruberry & Garvey).

Jane Doe v. John Doe Corp., United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. 1997. Represented plaintiff, assistant to CEO of a subsidiary of a Fortune 500 company. Sexual battery and hostile environment sex discrimination claims against the President of a subsidiary of the Fortune 500 company that worked at the headquarters. $100,000 settlement for emotional distress without filing suit after executive admitted the crux of the charges in pre-filing mediation.

Jane Doe v. John Doe Car Dealer, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. 1998. Represented plaintiff, who was a top-performing salesperson at a car dealership in a sex discrimination case. Case settled for $45,000.

Bark v. Emsco, United States District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois, Eastern Division. Judge Kokoras. 1994. Represented plaintiff, a doctor who had headed emergency room of a large Chicago Hospital in sex discrimination, libel and retaliatory discharge claim seeking over $1 million in damages and attorneys fees. Defendants' motion to dismiss denied. The case settled for a confidential sum following several written opinions by the Court adopting plaintiff's positions. See 1994 WL 502786; 1994 WL 280077. Defendants provided written retraction. Opposing Counsel: Donald C. Shine (Nisen & Elliott).


Will v. Comprehensive Accounting Corp., United States District Court Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Judge Plunkett. 1983-1985. Antitrust tying and breach of franchise contracts. Claim that franchisor improperly forced 13 of its accounting practice franchisees to purchase unwanted and overpriced data processing services. Represented all 13 franchisees. Six-week jury trial. Not guilty on antitrust tying count. Six plaintiffs won and six plaintiffs lost on breach of contract claims. See 775 F2d 665. Opposing counsel: Edward Foote and Duane Kelly (Winston & Strawn).

Fontana Aviation v. Cessna Aircraft, United States District Court Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Judge Bua. 1983-1984. Antitrust: claimed that Cessna acted in restraint of trade when it destroyed a custom avionics dealership. Represented plaintiff. Three-week jury trial. Not guilty. See 617 F2d 478. Opposing counsel: Alan Becker (Kirkland & Ellis).

Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, United States District Court Houston, Texas, Judge Singleton. 1983-1985. Antitrust: price-fixing conspiracy. Represented opt-out corporate plaintiffs, Pillsbury, Green Giant, U.S. Gypsum and Dean Foods Company. Settled as to all defendants except CCA. Pillsbury earned half its corporate profits for one year from the settlements. Settlement amounts: Pillsbury ($8.5 million); U.S. Gypsum ($1 million); Dean ($850,000). Twelve-week jury trial as to CCA. The jury found price-fixing conspiracy, but no damages. See 756 F2d 411. Opposing counsel: CCA-Sanford Litvak (former head of the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and former General Counsel of the Walt Disney Company).

ROI v. Translogic, United States District Court Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Judge Norgle. 1988. Attempted Monopolization Claims. Represented defendant Translogic. Motion to dismiss half of the plaintiff's antitrust claims granted. Case settled. See 702 FSupp 677. Co-counsel: Arnold & Porter. Opposing counsel: Paul Slater (Sperling Slater & Spitz).

Vinegar Antitrust Litigation, United States District Court Northern District of Illinois, Western Division, Judge Roszowski. 1989-1992. Antitrust price-fixing case. Represented plaintiff class. Settlement achieved prior to trial worth at least $6 million to the class. Lead Counsel: Perry Goldberg (Altheimer & Gray). Opposing counsel: Howery & Simon; Whitman & Ransom; Jones Day Reavis & Pogue; and Caldwalader Wickersham & Taft.

Glass Containers Antitrust Litigation, United States District Court Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Judge Will. 1989-1982. Antitrust price-fixing case. Represented plaintiff class. Settlement achieved prior to trial worth at least $70 million to the class. Lead counsel: Gig Specks (Altheimer & Gray). Opposing counsel: Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal; Kirkland & Ellis; Brown & Bain; Sidley Austin, Brown & Wood.

Constitutional Law

Pillsbury v. Conboy, United States Supreme Court. 1983. Constitutional Law/Fifth Amendment Privilege: Whether the prior grant of immunity extends to a civil deposition? See 459 US 248. Represented Pillsbury. Supreme Court upheld the assertion of privilege. Opposing counsel: Michael Coffield (Michael Coffield & Associates).

Dean Foods Company v. Clinton, State Court Arkansas. 1984. State Constitutional Law/Interference With Property Rights: Whether Arkansas minimum milk pricing statute was an unconstitutional infringement on property rights? Represented Dean Foods Company. Court found statute unconstitutional. Then Attorney General (and later President) Bill Clinton's office did not appeal the court's finding.

Legal Malpractice Litigation

Rykaczewski v. Cesario & Walker, Circuit Court of DuPage County. 1999. Attorney malpractice claim. Represented plaintiffs, litigants whose trial attorney allegedly improperly hired their expert witness for trial on a contingency fee despite an ethical rule prohibiting such an arrangement. The trial court ruled that the expert witness could not testify thus causing the 9 litigants to lose their case. A malpractice case against litigant's attorney settled for $375,000 following non-binding mediation. Opposing Attorney: Jeffrey Zehe (Clausen Miller).

Markel v. Weiss, Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Judge Gillis. 1996. Attorney malpractice claim. Represented plaintiff, the buyer of a business who lost over $300,000 due to his attorney's alleged failure to follow the form book in the sale of a business transaction. After deposing the attorney defendant, defendant requested a non-binding mediation with former Judge Brian Crowe acting as mediator. The case settled for $200,000 which represented nearly all that remained in the attorney malpractice insurance policy. Opposing Counsel: Thomas Browne (Hinshaw & Culbertson).

Ettswold v. Economy Ins. and Orner & Wasserman, Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Judge Gillis. 1996. Insurance bad faith and legal malpractice claims arising from $350,000 judgment entered against Ettswold in a car accident case. The judgment entered against Ettswold was $250,000 in excess of her insurance policy limits. One month after filing suit on Ettswold's behalf, her insurance company, Economy settled by paying the plaintiff in the car accident case $190,000 to release all his claims against Ettswold for the $250,000 in excess of her insurance policy limits. As part of the settlement, Economy also agreed to pay all of Ettswold's attorneys' fees. Opposing counsel: Norton Wasserman (Orner & Wasserman) and Jack Martin (Touhy & Martin).

Ardebili v. Taha, et al, Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Judge Mason. 2007- 2008. Representing business purchaser plaintiff in Legal Malpractice, Consumer Fraud, Rescission, Negligent Misrepresentation, Breach of Contract and Common Law Fraud claims stemming from the attempted purchase of a business. The case settled financial terms confidential. Opposing Counsel: Nicholas Albukerk (Law Offices of J. Nicholas Albukerk), Sana'a Hussien (Cohen & Hussien) and Amy Ezeldin.

Client Reviews
I was referred to Peter Lubin from someone in the car business to handle a law suit. From the moment I made the appointment Peter and his staff were outstanding. This wasn't an easy case, most lawyers had turned me down. However, Peter took the time to meet with me and review everything. He took on the case, and constantly communicated with me about updates and case information. We beat this non-compete agreement case in record time. I would use him again and recommend him to my closest family and friends. 5 stars is not enough to thank him for his service. Sebastian R.
I worked on two occasions with Peter Lubin and his staff. They took their time with me and discussed each and every item in detail. The group makes you feel like you are part of the family and not just another hourly charge. I recommend Peter to anyone who asks me for a referral. If you are looking for a top notch attorney at a reasonable rate, look no further than Lubin Austermuehle. Kurt A.
Excellent law firm. My case was a complicated arbitration dispute from another state. Was handled with utmost professionalism and decency. Mr. Peter Lubin was able to successfully resolve the case on my behalf and got me a very favorable settlement. Would recommend to anyone looking for a serious law firm. Great staff and great lawyers! Albey L.
I have known Peter Lubin for over 30 years. He has represented me on occasion with sound legal advice. He is a shrewd and tough negotiator leading to positive outcomes and averting prolonged legal hassles in court. He comes from a family with a legal pedigree and deep roots in Chicago's top legal community. You want him on your case. You need him on your opponents case. He won't stop fighting until he wins. Christopher G.
Peter was really nice and helpful when I came to him with an initial question about a non-compete. Would definitely reach out again, recommended to everyone. Johannes B.